Application Guide

Geophysical Equipment for Utility Locating & Mapping

Ground penetrating radar and electromagnetic (EM) instruments find buried pipes, cables and ducts before excavation, and turn a site into a utility map that designers and contractors can trust.

Utility strikes are expensive and dangerous, and drawings are often incomplete. A non-intrusive survey combines two complementary physics: GPR images anything that contrasts with the surrounding soil — plastic, concrete and clay pipes as well as metal — while EM methods respond to metallic and conductive objects and can trace them over long distances.

Most professional utility surveys use both: EM to sweep for metallic services and conductive anomalies, GPR to confirm depth and to catch non-metallic services that EM cannot see.

Methods Compared

Geophysical methods for Utility Locating & Mapping
MethodDetectsTypical DepthLimitations
Ground penetrating radar (single-channel)Metallic and non-metallic pipes, ducts, chambers, voidsTypically 0.5–3 m, less in wet clayPenetration collapses in conductive clay and saline ground; needs line-by-line grids
Dual-frequency GPRShallow detail and deeper services in one passTypically up to a few metresSame ground limits as GPR, but fewer passes needed
3D array GPRFull 3D utility maps over wide areasSimilar to single-channel GPRHigher capital cost; most efficient on large or open sites
EM metal detection / time-domain EMMetallic pipes, cables, buried metalTypically up to 2–3 m for larger targetsBlind to plastic and clay; nearby fences and vehicles interfere

Depths are typical field values — actual performance depends on ground conditions, target size and survey design.

Choosing between single-channel and 3D GPR

Single-channel and dual-frequency systems are the workhorses for day-to-day locating: quick to deploy, easy to interpret on screen, and enough for most trench-and-mark jobs. 3D arrays collect a full data volume in each pass and produce depth slices that show how services connect — the right tool for full-site utility mapping, road corridors and congested urban sites, where coverage per day drives the project cost.

Ground conditions matter more than the instrument

GPR performance depends on soil electrical conductivity. Dry sand and gravel allow deep penetration; wet clay, saline soil and slag fill can limit it to well under a metre whatever the antenna. A short test line before committing to a method is good practice — and the main reason survey firms keep both GPR and EM in their kit.

Recommended Instruments

A selection from our catalog. We source many more models — tell us what you need.

Which Condition Tier?

Utility survey firms often run a New or Absolute Certified primary system and add Refurbished units for extra crews. Superseded control units and antennas in Surplus condition are a low-cost way to add a frequency to an existing kit or to stock spares.

See the condition tier guide for what New, Refurbished, Absolute Certified and Surplus each include, or the industries overview for related sectors.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can GPR detect plastic pipes?

Yes. GPR responds to contrasts in electrical (dielectric) properties, so plastic pipes, especially water-filled ones, are usually visible. EM methods cannot detect plastic, which is why the two are used together.

How deep can utility GPR see?

In typical soils, utility GPR in the 250–800 MHz range sees roughly 0.5–3 m. Dry sandy ground allows more; wet clay or saline ground can limit it to less than a metre.

Do I need a 3D GPR array?

Not for routine locate-and-mark work. 3D arrays pay off on large or congested sites, full utility mapping projects and road corridors, where they cover far more ground per day and show how services connect.

Other Applications

Need Equipment for Utility Locating & Mapping?

Tell us about your site and targets — we'll recommend instruments and quote New, Refurbished, Absolute Certified, or Surplus options.